Ocean for Future

Ultima Clock Widget

  • :
  • :

Vediamo che tempo fa o farà

Diamo un’occhiata al tempo meteorologico

Meteo facile per tutti: vediamo che tempo fa o farà prossimamente con un insieme di link per aggiornarvi in tempo reale sulle condizioni meteorologiche locali e marine 


A Preliminary Investigation of the Effect of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Effluent Discharge Options on Global OTEC Resources – part I by Gerard Nihous

tempo di lettura: 8 minuti


livello difficile
parole chiave: OTEC

Fonti alternative
L’articolo presenta i risultati di uno studio per ottimizzare i processi OTEC. L’Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) è un processo in grado di produrre elettricità utilizzando la differenza di temperatura tra l’acqua oceanica profonda e le calde acque di superficie tropicali. 

Gli impianti OTEC pompano grandi quantità di acqua di mare fredda e profonda e acqua di superficie in superficie per far funzionare un ciclo di energia e produrre elettricità. Un semplice algoritmo utilizzato in precedenza per valutare le risorse OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion) globali stazionarie è stato esteso per sondare l’effetto di varie metodologie di scarico degli effluenti. Si è riscontrato che le scariche separate dell’evaporatore e del condensatore aumentano potenzialmente i limiti di potenza netti dell’OTEC di circa il 60% in uno scenario di rilascio misto comparabile. Ciò deriva da un degrado relativamente minore della risorsa termica a determinate portate di acqua di mare, che corrisponde a un minore apporto di calore nell’oceano. Successivamente, il caso più pratico di uno scarico misto nello strato misto si trova a corrispondere solo all’80% della sua baseline. In generale, la localizzazione degli scarichi di effluenti alle profondità di galleggiamento neutro iniziali sembra essere quasi ottimale in termini di limiti di produzione di energia netta. Tuttavia, la profondità selezionata per lo scarico dell’effluente del condensatore OTEC ha di gran lunga l’impatto maggiore.
A simple algorithm previously used to evaluate steady-state global Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) resources is extended to probe the effect of various effluent discharge methodologies. It is found that separate evaporator and condenser discharges potentially increase OTEC net power limits by about 60% over a comparable mixed discharge scenario. This stems from a relatively less severe degradation of the thermal resource at given OTEC seawater flow rates, which corresponds to a smaller heat input into the ocean. Next, the most practical case of a mixed discharge into the mixed layer is found to correspond to only 80% of the so-called baseline case (mixed discharge at a water depth of initial neutral buoyancy). In general, locating effluent discharges at initial neutral-buoyancy depths appears to be nearly optimal in terms of OTEC net power production limits. The depth selected for the OTEC condenser effluent discharge, however, has by far the greatest impact. Clearly, these results are preliminary and should be investigated in more complex ocean general circulation models.

Systematic analyses of large-scale Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) impacts and their possible feedback effects on the size of global OTEC resources have been few probably for two main reasons. On one hand, it is a dauntingly complex problem to tackle, even with the recent availability of massive computing capabilities; simplifying the modeling framework may prove expedient, but excessive simplifications also introduce limitations and are likely to cast doubts on any result. More importantly, the urgency of solving such a problem is bound to seem remote given the very slow pace of development afflicting OTEC technologies. From environmental and permitting perspectives, however, one should recognize an increasing tendency to expect a grasp of large-scale impacts for any given technology, even if a specific project is small and isolated. The analysis of the impacts of large-scale OTEC development using a locally one-dimensional (1-D) framework was spearheaded by Martin and Roberts for the Gulf of Mexico [1], when computing capabilities were very limited; the reduction of a fully three-dimensional problem was more easily justified in this case of a semi-enclosed body of water. Drawing on experience acquired with one-dimensional oceanic models applied to a newly proposed geo-engineering concept at global scales [2,3], the deep ocean sequestration of anthropogenic carbon dioxide, Nihous later probed the issue of large-scale OTEC resources with similar models [4,5,6]. The limitations of this approach were never in doubt, since horizontal transport phenomena are dominant in the ocean, and the situation far more complex than represented in simple advection-diffusion models of the oceanic water column. In the absence of any rational method to assess global OTEC resources, though, the motivation for such studies was to be able to provide a starting point for future, more elaborate analyses, while identifying possible qualitative features of large-scale OTEC impacts, including self-limiting modifications of the vertical thermal structure of the ocean.

Studies of large-scale OTEC development using state-of-the-art three-dimensional (3-D) ocean general circulation models were initiated more recently [7,8,9] and provided significant additional insight toward the evaluation of sustainable OTEC resources, and of the potential large-scale environmental effects associated with the widespread implementation of the OTEC technology. They were able, in particular, to predict geographically differentiated effects that a one-dimensional model cannot address. Even with this more sophisticated and numerically intensive work, however, many issues remain to be addressed in order to gain further confidence in the results. In the most recent attempt to improve the underlying modeling protocol, for example, a low-complexity atmospheric model was coupled with a previously selected oceanic general circulation model to better represent feedback effects between ocean and atmosphere [10].

A somewhat surprising result from the much more complex analyses was that many predicted qualitative features were also apparent from the simple 1-D models, among which the existence of a steady-state (asymptotic) global OTEC net power maximum primarily caused by an accumulation of heat in the mid-depth water column. In both classes of models, and for various OTEC scenarios, the temperature profiles in the OTEC region, at maximum net power output, share many similarities, including, in particular, the amount of warming around the deep cold seawater intake depth in the OTEC region. As a result, maximum OTEC net power essentially remains proportional to deep seawater intake flow rate (or equivalently, nominal OTEC power, if there were no seawater temperature changes), with a value of the order of 0.20 TW Sv−1 (one terawatt is 1012 W, and one sverdrup is 106 m3 s−1); this also corresponds to a net power ratio of about 45% (i.e., power produced over nominal power). What mainly differentiates the ‘bulk’ output from all models and scenarios so far is the magnitude of the overall OTEC deep cold seawater flow rate at which OTEC net power would peak. In one-dimensional models, it basically takes much smaller OTEC seawater flow rates to modify the existing seawater temperature profiles. These points can be appreciated in Figure 1, where the output of the most basic steady-state 1-D model has been adapted ‘locally’ to every 1 degree by 1 degree (latitude-longitude) cell of the OTEC region [4]; the precise definition of the OTEC region, as well as the OTEC warm-to-cold seawater flow rate ratio (1.5 here, instead of 2) and net power formula were adapted for comparison to the most recent 3-D study [10].

Figure 1. Overall OTEC net power as a function of nominal OTEC net power (i.e., with unchanging seawater temperatures) using two models of vastly different complexity; 1-D results have been adapted to inputs and conventions of the 3-D study. da http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/6/1/25/htm

What all large-scale OTEC studies to date have shared is the protocol for effluent discharge. The initial 1-D analyses called for a mixed-effluent discharge at a water depth where the released water would be neutrally buoyant in the unperturbed ocean (i.e., without temperature changes) [4,5]. No rationale was explicitly given. The same discharge method was used in the more elaborate 3-D work, although it was recognized that an actual effluent discharge would likely occur in shallower waters, but that the ensuing plume effects (sub-grid sinking and turbulent mixing) could not adequately be captured in the ocean general circulation model at selected grid resolutions [7,8]; this also was consistent with running the numerically less intensive hydrostatic version of the 3-D code, where the vertical momentum equation is reduced to a hydrostatic balance. In a later study, the discharge protocol was described as a choice “with little loss of generality [9]”, which may well turn out to be an incorrect statement.

While care was taken to avoid plume effects with OTEC effluents, other studies were conducted with similar modeling tools to investigate artificial upwelling, where convective mixing cannot be avoided since denser water is brought to shallower depths by design [11,12]. Even though the same caveats would apply, it was demonstrated at least that stable steady-state temperature profiles are obtained following artificial upwelling (while convective mixing schemes are used for transient calculations). Therefore, there is little reason not to contemplate alternative OTEC effluent discharge scenarios, at least from a steady-state (sustainable) perspective. This allows, in particular, the consideration of what is believed to be the most practical OTEC effluent discharge scenario, i.e., within (or just below) the oceanic mixed layer [13]. Also, the option of locating the OTEC condenser and the cold seawater ducting at depth has been proposed for some time [14,15,16], to eliminate the need for a large and costly pipe extending from the cold seawater withdrawal depth to the surface. Although detailed designs are lacking for such a concept, with serious engineering challenges of its own, implementing OTEC with a deep condenser certainly would require the cold effluent discharge to be treated separately.

The preliminary analytical evaluation of alternative OTEC effluent discharge schemes described below is based on a simple but numerically efficient 1-D algorithm [4]. The model, described in Section 2, is an extension of the published version that allows the possibility of separate OTEC evaporator and condenser discharges. Results are given in Section 3, where on one hand, mixed and separate OTEC discharges are compared, and on the other hand, more practical cases of mixed or evaporator effluent discharges in shallow water are also considered.

Gérard Nihous
Department of Ocean and Resources Engineering, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; Tel.: +1-808-956-2338


Fine parte I  – continua


Alcune delle foto presenti in questo blog possono essere state prese dal web, citandone ove possibile gli autori e/o le fonti. Se qualcuno desiderasse specificarne l’autore o rimuoverle, può scrivere a infoocean4future@gmail.com e provvederemo immediatamente alla correzione dell’articolo



  1. Martin, P.J.; Roberts, G.O. An estimate of the impact of OTEC operation on the vertical distribution of heat in the Gulf of Mexico. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on OTEC, New Orleans, LA, USA, 22–24 March 1977; pp. 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nihous, G.C.; Masutani, S.M.; Vega, L.A.; Kinoshita, C.M. Projected impact of deep ocean carbon dioxide discharge on atmospheric CO2Clim. Chang. 199427, 225–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nihous, G.C.; Masutani, S.M.; Vega, L.A.; Kinoshita, C.M. Preliminary assessment of the potential coupling between atmospheric temperature and CO2concentration via ocean water overturning. Energy Convers. Manag. 199637, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nihous, G.C. An order-of-magnitude estimate of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion resources.  Energy Resour. Technol.2005127, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nihous, G.C. A preliminary assessment of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) resources.  Energy Resour. Technol.2007129, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nihous, G.C. An estimate of Atlantic Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) resources. Ocean Eng.200734, 2210–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rajagopalan, K.; Nihous, G.C. Estimates of global Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) resources using an Ocean General Circulation Model.  Energy201350, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rajagopalan, K.; Nihous, G.C. An assessment of global Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) resources with a high-resolution Ocean General Circulation Model.  Energy Resour. Technol.2013135, 041202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rajagopalan, K.; Nihous, G.C. An assessment of global Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion resources under broad geographical constraints.  Renew. Sustain. Energy20135, 063124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jia, Y.; Nihous, G.C.; Rajagopalan, K. An evaluation of the large-scale implementation of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) using an ocean general circulation model with low-complexity atmospheric feedback effects.  Mar. Sci. Eng.20186, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nihous, G.C. Assessment of the evolution of water-column stratification following the hypothetical implementation of widespread controlled upwelling in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre.  Mar. Environ. Eng.20129, 175–189. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rajagopalan, K.; Nihous, G.C. Predictions of water-column properties under widespread artificial upwelling scenarios in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre using an ocean general circulation model.  Mar. Environ. Eng.20149, 285–304. [Google Scholar]
  13. Avery, W.H.; Wu, C. Renewable Energy from the Ocean; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994; p. 446. ISBN 0195071999. [Google Scholar]
  14. Manikowski, A.F. Deep water condenser OTEC using carbon dioxide working fluid. In Proceedings of the OCEANS’95 MTS/IEEE Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–12 October 1995; Volume 2, pp. 1092–1099. [Google Scholar]
  15. Srinivasan, N. A new improved Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion system with suitable vessel design. In Proceedings of the ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu, HI, USA, 31 May–5 June 2009; Volume 4, pp. 1119–1129. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fachina, V. Deep-Subsea OTEC.  Eng. Res.20177, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 1There are typographic errors in [11], Equation (7): within the bracket, T should replace T0 and −QupT is missing.

© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).







(Visited 297 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 voti
Article Rating
0 Commenti
Inline Feedbacks
vedi tutti i commenti




livello elementare
articoli di facile lettura

livello medio
articoli che richiedono conoscenze avanzate

livello difficile
articoli di interesse specialistico


Attenzione: È importante ricordare che gli articoli da noi pubblicati riflettono le opinioni e le prospettive degli autori o delle fonti citate, ma non necessariamente quelle di questo portale. E’ convinzione che la diversità di opinioni è ciò che rende il dibattito e la discussione più interessanti, aiutandoci a comprendere tutti gli aspetti della Marittimità

Chi c'é online

9 visitatori online

Ricerca multipla

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Associazioni per la cultura del mare
Astronomia e Astrofisica
Cartografia e nautica
Chi siamo
Conoscere il mare
Didattica a distanza
Emergenze ambientali
Gli uomini dei record
I protagonisti del mare
Il mondo della vela
L'immersione scientifica
La pesca
La pirateria
La subacquea ricreativa
Lavoro subacqueo - OTS
Le plastiche
Letteratura del mare
Marina mercantile
Marine militari
Medicina subacquea
Meteorologia e stato del mare
Miti e leggende del mare
nautica e navigazione
Ocean for future
per conoscerci
Pesca non compatibile
SAVE THE OCEAN BY OCEANDIVER campaign 4th edition
Scienze del mare
Sicurezza marittima
Storia contemporanea
Storia Contemporanea
Storia della subacquea
Storia della Terra
Storia Navale
Storia navale del Medioevo (post 476 d.C. - 1492)
Storia Navale dell'età antica (3.000 a.C. - 476 d.C,)
Storia navale dell'età moderna (post 1492 - oggi)
Storia navale della prima guerra mondiale (1914-1918)
Storia navale della seconda guerra mondiale (1939 - 1945)
Storia navale Romana
Subacquei militari
Sviluppi della scienza
sviluppi tecnologici
Sviluppo compatibile
Uomini di mare
Wellness - Benessere

I più letti di oggi

I più letti in assoluto

Tutela della privacy – Quello che dovete sapere

> Per contatti di collaborazione inviate la vostra richiesta a infoocean4future@gmail.com specificando la vostra area di interesse
9 visitatori online
9 ospiti, 0 membri
Complessivo: 742 alle 21-09--2018 06:47 pm
Numero max di visitatori odierni: 32 alle 12:27 am
Mese in corso: 65 alle 05-07--2024 10:16 am
Anno in corso: 120 alle 20-06--2024 08:56 pm
Translate »
Cosa ne pensate?x